Torosyan's Response to Marukyan's Statement

Our former colleague Edmon Marukyan has recently been actively promoting and advancing the November 9 document, and although I am on the verge of losing my astonishment at some of the thoughts and calls that have been voiced in our political system, I am once again genuinely surprised.

This was stated by MP Arsen Torosyan of the ruling Civil Contract Party on Facebook.

“Mr. Marukyan says that we should demand the implementation of the provisions of that document, probably forgetting that since the moment of signing that document, we were doing just that, but the reality turned out to be the opposite. Not long after the signing, the other two parties – Russia and Azerbaijan – began to violate the document. It is surprising how one can forget so much. How can one forget Khtsaberd, Parukh, the blockade of the Lachin corridor, and the failure to return the captives? Or is it possible that he remembers everything well but is promoting a different agenda? Might the return of Russian troops and control over the corridor be that agenda? No, no, I do not claim that Mr. Marukyan wants to return us under Russian pressure and make concessions from our sovereign territory; I am simply thinking aloud.

P.S. I would never have thought that the infamous ‘third way’ is the corridor conceded from our sovereign territory,” Torosyan noted.