Azerbaijanis on the Tripartite Statement Signed in Sochi

The Azerbaijan Postfactum Telegram channel presents the response of Azerbaijani media platforms regarding the tripartite statement signed in Sochi on November 26.

Negative. The meeting was not tripartite, it was bilateral (Russia-Azerbaijan). After Nikol Pashinyan's choice, Armenia is no longer a party. Russia, Iran, and Armenia have been our enemies. When the Armenians occupied our lands, Russia was backing Armenia and directly or indirectly protecting them. The statement that was signed says nothing, we gained nothing from it. The main thesis was 'Conflict is bad, peace is good.' But, for example, they asked: do we or the Armenians want peace? It was time for the 'KGB' to report, not a tripartite meeting... What our channel sees in the context of that meeting is the meeting of the leader of a country that has occupied another state's territory (referring to Russia's presence in Artsakh) with the leader of that territory occupied by that state. Instead of a harsh conversation with the aggressor (Russia), there were hugs, kisses, sweet and tender speeches.

Positive. We managed to achieve that there is no mention of the OSCE in the document. Finally, there will be delimitation, and our soldiers will remain where they were positioned after May 12. Thanks to the Pashinyan-Aliyev cooperation, the process of opening the Zangezur corridor has begun, and there was no mention of the 'future' of Artsakh.