I Will Be Surprised If People Have Confidence to Collaborate with This Company: MP

MP Vahagn Tevosyan from the "My Step" faction of the National Assembly wrote on his Facebook page: "Yes, regarding the logo, 'Garun' has attempted to provide some explanation as to why it did not violate the legislation, unequivocally confirming that they were aware of the 1991 version and, moreover, were inspired by it. If we assume that, for instance, I am not violating the legislation, even then, it does not give me the right to reference The Beatles as a source of inspiration while trying to infringe upon the rights of Grammy's on my behalf with 'Hey Jude.' Considering that there has been, in my opinion, a gross violation of ethical norms, I will be surprised if people have confidence to collaborate with this company from now on.

Nonetheless, I will still ask our experts to provide a detailed briefing on whether everything related to the implementation of the law is normal. As for the logo itself, allow me to express a very subjective personal opinion: I believe that the choice of what the logo looks like is the prerogative of the campaigning side. That side is interested in the visual success of its campaign.

Where does this requirement for a professional jury come from? Are you sure it is right if the professional jury is so biased that it selects a logo that contributes to the success of AYU? After all, is it the emblem of the Republic or the capital under discussion, or is it a contender for a state award?"