Lawyer of Khachatryan Sisters Provides New Details

The lawyer representing the Khachatryan sisters, accused in the murder of Mikhail Khachatryan, Alexey Parshin, has shared new details on his Facebook page regarding Mikhail Khachatryan.

“We continue to investigate the identity of Mikhail Khachatryan based on the evidence related to his daughters. So, who was he? A loving but strict father or a sadistic criminal? In this context, I present the arsenal found in Mikhail Khachatryan's home. Who could this man be? Why did he need a weapon? Perhaps for self-defense? Maybe he was protecting the weak? Perhaps he is a collector? No, no, and no. It was necessary to be used against the weak and defenseless, those who cannot fight back, those who lack strength or position. For him, it was ordinary to cut the throat of his own child, to hit with the butt of a pistol ... And someone finds a way to justify this brutality as upbringing. But one family, as a battlefield to show its power, was not enough for Khachatryan. The girls said that Mikhail Khachatryan carried a weapon and had threatened completely unknown people on occasions. We continually find confirmation on this matter.

One volume contains a case that leads to certain thoughts. On December 15, 2013, Ms. Belevtsova T.V. appealed to the police (I publish the documents with her consent, my covering of personal data such as phone numbers, addresses, and car state numbers). The original address matches that of Mikhail Khachatryan, and the car number corresponds to his vehicle's number, requesting to hold a citizen accountable who had been asked to remove his car from the sidewalk and clear the way to the entrance. In response, the owner of the Lexus began to exhibit aggressive behavior, using profane language and brandishing a pistol with the following words: 'I will kill you.' This seemed a crime. It is clear who committed this, it is clear where he lives; he is not hiding. You can bring a case ... But for some reason, the material turned out to be with the regional police officer, who confirmed where the aforementioned citizen lives; however, he decided not to initiate a criminal case because ... no one opened the door for him. A question arises: why not force entry into the house? After all, our brave police would, if they desired, even send a case of the deceased to court! Is inaction due to indifference or out of a lack of interest? The answer to why he has never faced punishment for this case, nor for numerous other cases, is available. But my colleagues and I will discuss this later. There should be intrigue, right? (I promise this will be epic). In the meantime, read, be amazed, and be perplexed.