Video: I said that Nikol cannot be Prime Minister - SHARMANZANOV from the Republican Party expresses concern

The spokesperson for the Republican Party, Edward Sharmanazov, once again spoke about the government's and Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan's activities during a live session on Facebook.

He specifically noted, “Yesterday it became clear that, no more, no less, there is a spokesperson in the government of Armenia. And this spokesperson is not the people, nor the citizens, nor even the crowd gathered in the square, but from today, according to Pashinyan, the spokesperson of the government is himself, Prime Minister Pashinyan. The reality has changed again. Wasn't he the one who said, 'Each of you is the Prime Minister; you are the spokesperson; however you say it, that's how it will be'? Now we are moving toward a government of spokespeople. Didn't I say we are heading toward dictatorship, and you didn't believe me?

Secondly, it turns out that our government leader is not aware that the Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe has made concerning remarks regarding March 1 (to put it mildly, concerning remarks). When journalists ask questions, he says, 'I am not aware.' Well, excuse me, what are you aware of? Our Prime Minister is unaware of the Bolten-Aliyev conversation, is unaware of the Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe's comments on March 1. Here, there are two options: either his assistants, advisers, and the government are receiving pointless salaries and bonuses, or, which suits him, he positions himself as an unaware person. But I believe that the Prime Minister of Armenia should be the most informed person in the country. Didn't I say that he cannot be a Prime Minister? Many criticized me for that.

Thirdly, let’s come to the issue of Artsakh. I have pointed out more than once that concerning developments are possible in the Artsakh resolution process. Moreover, two days ago, in the press conference held, I mentioned that it is very possible that the concept of 'territories in exchange for peace' will be put into action. And I stated that the concept of 'territories in exchange for peace' is nothing less than betrayal. Yesterday, Pashinyan stated that he does not intend to discuss the territories in exchange for peace concept. Excuse me, but I do not believe it. You might ask, why? I will answer:

The same Pashinyan promised that the budget would increase by thirty percent; the same Pashinyan promised that the red lines would be removed; the same Pashinyan promised that the gas prices would drop; the same Pashinyan promised that the surveillance cameras would be removed; the same Pashinyan promised that investments would increase, and so on. But the exact opposite happened.